Showing off an old project

This is an old project indeed - it's been a finished object since Midsummer, but I just got the photos organised and thought I'd tell a little about it. I am, if nothing, a leisurely spinner... but the FO was done in about 2 months. Go figure!

Esittelen tässä vanhan projektin, kun löysin kuvia. Kehruussa kesti kauan, mutta valmis shaali valmistui parissa kuukaudessa!

It started out with this merino-silk top from Limegreenjelly at Etsy, in October 2009:
Lokakuussa 2009 oli Limegreenjelly:n merino-silkkitopsia:

From Melodrama-2010-2011

Which I split from the middle into two thinner pieces:
Jonka halkaisin kahtia:

From Melodrama-2010-2011

And spun with my 15g Bosworth top whorl:
Ja kehräsin Bosworthin 15g yläpainoisella värttinällä:

From Melodrama-2010-2011

Then, in August 2010, it came time for the singles to be plied:
Elokuussa 2010 kerrattiin jo:

From Melodrama-2010-2011

But finally, I had finished yarn:
Lankaa!

From Melodrama-2010-2011

Which I used to make a Laminaria shawl, this year in June:
Josta tuli tämän vuoden kesäkuussa Laminaria

From Crafts - Jun 30, 2011

What I did on my summer holiday

Having spent the Midsummer holidays in the peace and quiet of rainy countryside, I've finally dug up the camera and can give the report.
Vietin juhannusta viikon maaseudun rauhassa ja sain jotain valmiiksikin!

Just before leaving to the country, I put together these fancies from a couple of skull beads and jewellery parts I'd had laying around for ages:
Ennen lähtöä pistin kasaan pääkallohelmiä ja korunosia:

From Crafts - Jun 30, 2011

Finished the small size of Laminaria, from my own handspun:
Sain valmiiksi pienemmän Laminarian itsekehrätystä langasta:

From Crafts - Jun 30, 2011

Detail:
Lähikuvaa:

From Crafts - Jun 30, 2011

And the Drops cardi (modded to fit, switched to moss stitch edging):
Ja sitten Dropsin ohjeesta muokattu villatakki:

From Crafts - Jun 30, 2011

Then I finished one of the Bayerische socks and started a new one (had to change from the KnitPicks wooden needles to metal, because was constantly scared of breaking the 2mm:s with the twisted cables):
Sain myös toisen Bayerische-sukista valmiiksi ja aloitin uutta, kirpparilta löydetyillä metallipuikoilla sillä puiset 2mm puikot olivat pelottavan ohuet:

From Crafts - Jun 30, 2011

And finally, started practicing hand quilting stitches with a quilt block I'd made a couple of years ago:
Ja lopuksi, kaivoin esiin vanhan tilkkutyön ja aloin harjoittelemaan tikkaamista käsin:

From Crafts - Jun 30, 2011

Considering that I spent most of my time watching bad reality TV, reading and feeding the horse and myself, not bad!
Suurin osa viikosta kului huonoja telkkariohjelmia katsoessa, lukiessa ja syöttäessä vuoroin itseä ja vuoroin hevosta, mutta ilmeisesti laiskottelin vähemmän kuin luulin!

Stress Test for Yarn, cont'd

In an earlier blog post (Stress test for handspun yarn), I tested how different yarn structures handle stress. This is a continuation of the earlier experiment, because while it's interesting to know how heavy shopping bags you can hang from wool yarn, it's also interesting to see how wool handles abuse under stress.

All photos are clickable for a bigger version with more detail; measurements are in metric.

Test set-up


The equipment

The highly scientific and extremely rigorous test set-up consisted of two S-hooks, a cloth shopping bag, and paperback books plus packets of instant oatmeal (for weights). I tested the yarns by tying a certain length of yarn to the hooks, and then hanging the hook on one end to the bar for hanging coats in the hallway, and suspending the bag from the hook tied to the other end. Then I increased the load by adding books/oatmeal (or applied abrasion) until the yarn broke.


String heddles for abrasion test, singles of yarn used in testing

Some notes about the yarn used for the tests:

Fibre: 100% merino wool, commercial top
Tool: Spun with a wheel, plied with a Bosworth mini spindle
Drafting method: short draw across the top
Twist direction: Z-spun singles, all yarns S-plied
Type: worsted
Notes: The twist angle is not completely consistent, since I scavenged extra singles and remnants of a 3-ply sock yarn, and for some samples had to unply and re-ply to get enough material. This may have skewed the results for some experiments.

I first tested how much weight would be needed to break one singles of the yarn. This turned out to be ca. 640 g (22.5 oz). After determining that, I tensioned the length of yarn to be tested with a bag full of books and oatmeal packets weighing the aforementioned ca. 640 g (22.5 oz) and repeatedly pulled a cotton string tied in the shape of a heddle over a 10-20 cm section (4-9 in), at the same time pulling the yarn about 5-10 cm (2 in) to one side from the straight line, and counted how many times I could move the heddle into one direction (up or down) before the yarn broke.

Side note: wool, especially worsted-spun wool, is stronger than you'd think. It ate through my string heddles (as you can see), and I had to repair them several times. And this is rug warp for rag rugs - the same stuff that carves deep grooves in the wood beams of the loom.

Yarn breaking in numbers and pictures

Intact yarns

Baseline:
Singles - intact
Breaking from weight alone: 642 g (not pictured)




2-ply - intact
Breaking from weight alone: 1472 g




Chain ply (1) - intact
Breaking from weight alone: 3016 g




3-ply (1) - intact
Breaking from weight alone: 2306 g




Chain ply (1) - intact
Abrasion at the knot: 219 passes (2nd try: 263 passes; not pictured)




3-ply (1) - intact
Abrasion: 464 passes (1st try: 76 passes; yarn not comparable with significantly softer twist; not pictured)


One strand cut



3-ply - 1 strand cut
Abrasion: 69 passes




Chain ply - 1 strand belonging to the “straight line” in the knot cut at a distance of ca. 3 cm from the knot
Abrasion at the knot: 56 passes




Chain ply - 1 strand belonging to a loop in the knot cut at a distance of 7 cm from the knot
Abrasion at the knot: 3 passes


Thoughts

Chain ply and 3-ply are structurally different, but in many situations they are just as strong. However, while parts of 3-ply and chain ply are identical, the knot in chain ply has interesting behaviour. When any of the strands forming the two locked loops in the knot is broken close enough to the knot that friction can’t stop the loop from slipping open, the end result is only one intact singles at that particular point, so the yarn behaves as a singles yarn. But if the “straight line” strand is broken, the locked loop is intact and behaves comparably to a 2-ply (a 3-ply with one strand cut becomes a 2-ply at that spot).

Sounds scary? Well, even in weaving, where the real life (i.e. yarn under tension and abrasion from heddles) more closely follows my experiment, you may not run into any problems. After all, with the yarns I hadn't deliberately and maliciously sabotaged, it took literally hundreds of passes before the yarn broke, causing it to become fuzzy and visibly worn long before it broke. Also, I found that with wool, twist energy and the friction between the plies kept the yarn hanging together for a good long time even when a strand broke. Fibre and spinning can also make a difference - if you look at the results in the earlier blog post, the thinner woollen-spun yarn was significantly weaker. Someday, I may repeat this experiment with silk, to see what happens if you use a slipperier fibre...

So, what does that mean for practical purposes? Nothing much. In normal wear, I'd have no qualms making socks out of chain ply, let alone a whole sweater that faces much less abuse. Even if a weak spot snagged at a nail and the yarn broke, well, who's to say that the same thing wouldn't happen to a 3-ply?

But there can be some circumstances where the properties of chain ply vs. 3-ply can make a difference. As my sample size was small, the results changed significantly with the type of yarn used, and special circumstances are, well, special (such as weaving a thin silk scarf with a backstrap loom, or knitting a tablecloth-sized wedding ring shawl from whisper-thin frog hair you're planning to stretch and block aggressively) - if you're worried, it's best if you do a sample of your own first.

Lautanauhaa

Tässä se nyt sitten on:



Toinen harjoitusnauha Maikki Kariston kirjasta

Sain tämän valmiiksi jo perjantaina ja otin heti tuoreeltaan kuvat, olen sen jälkeen kyllä päätellyt langanpäät ja siistinyt tupsut. Lanka on pehmeää virkkauspuuvillaa, Punaisen Ristin kirpparilöytö joten merkkiä tai mallia en tiedä. Muuten hyvä, mutta nyppyyntyi lautojen kulutuksessa vähän.

Nauhalle ei ole mitään erityistä käyttöä, mutta kirjan kaikki eri vaihtoehdot kokeillessa oppi kyllä aika hyvin ymmärtämään miten laudoilla kutominen toimii! Nauhan eri puolille syntyy erinäköinen kuvio, joistain on vaikea päättää kumpi on se nurja ja kumpi oikea puoli. Kutominen oli myös todella nopeaa poimintakuvioisiin nauhoihin verrattuna, tosin huomasi taas että viiteen (tai kolmeen) laskeminen on yllättävän vaikeaa...

My first long card woven band, samples of different variations of a basic pattern. And some mistakes. Very fast compared to weaving pick-up patterns!

Kudontaa ja postin tuomaa

Ensiksi, vähän silmäkarkkia:



Vasemmalta: kaksi perulaista värttinää, ensimmäinen Independencian kaupungista Cochabamban maakunnasta, toinen from Cuscosta, ja sitten tuettu värttinä puuvillan kehruuseen Guatemalasta (Chichicastenango), viimeiseksi bolivialainen wichuña (laaman luusta tehty kankaankudontaväline, jolla painetaan kude paikoilleen).

Sain nämä vaihdossa Lavernelta, joka kutoo kaikkea todella kaunista yksinkertaisilla vartalokangaspuilla - hänen Backstrap Weaving -blogissaan näkee lisää. Kuten huomaatte, en millään malttanut olla kokeilematta värttinöitä - kahdella ensimmäisellä testasin vähän villaa ja viimeisellä puuvillaa.

Ruskealla värttinällä (ensimmäinen vasemmalta) on tarina: viime syksynä Perussa järjestetyssä kutojien ja kehrääjien konferenssissa pidettiin pikakehruukilpailu, ja Lavernen kämppis Maxima sai tällä värttinällä jaetun ykköstilan, tuloksella 6 metriä kahdessa minuutissa. Siinä olisi vähän tavoitetta seuraavaksi 30 vuodeksi...



Lautanauha

Edellisen kirjoituksen loimesta on tullut sitten tällaista harjoitusnauhaa Maikki Kariston kirjasta Lautanauhoja. Välissä on melkoista sotkuakin, mutta en ole pahemmin virheitä purkanut, koska tarkoituksena oli nimen omaan kokeilla kaikkea mahdollista! Lointa ei ole enää paljoa jäljellä, saa nähdä ehdinkö kutoa enää siihen kapenevan pään.



"Doubleweave" - kaksipuolista sidosta

Ylempänä mainitsin, että Lavernella on kudontablogi. Tämä on sitten hänen ohjeidensa mukaan kudottua kaksipuolista sidosta (one weft doubleweave), jolle en ole vielä ehtinyt etsiä "virallista" suomalaista nimeä. Hauskaa mutta hidasta, sillä jokainen loimilanka täytyy poimia viriöön erikseen sekä kuvion että taustan kohdalla - vähän niin kuin ristipistotyötä siis...

Vuoden alkua?

Tässä vähän maistiaisia viime vuodelta:



Ja jotain tänä vuonna aloitettua, joka on ehtinyt kyllä tästä vaiheesta jo aika paljon pitemmälle...



edit: Ja innoituksena kaikkeen tähän puun, pahvin ja langan kanssa näpertämiseen on ollut joululahjaksi toivottu ja saatu Maikki Kariston Lautanauhoja...

Matonkudontaa

Olen pitkään (siis pikkulapsesta asti) halunnut oppia kutomaan kangaspuilla. Tänä syksynä tajusin että voisihan tuota käydä vaikka kurssilla, ja lähdin sitten Pirkanmaan Kotityön järjestämälle kankaankudonnan peruskurssille Verkarannan taitopajassa. Mainostan että siellä järjestetään paljon muitakin kiinnostavia kursseja, niistä ei vain kuule koska niiden mainokset on piilotettu yhdistyksen omaan lehteen ja Verkarannan nettisivuille.

Kurssilla oli ensin teoriaosa jossa sai kyllä myös käytännön opastusta ja harjoitusta kangaspuiden kokoamisessa, loimen luonnissa ja rakentamisessa. Sitten saimme kukin kolme kudontapäivää, joilla tehdä mitä huvittaa. Itse olin saanut kaverilta matonkuteita, joten aioin käyttää ne loppuun. Matto ei ole ihan valmis vielä, viimeinen kudontapäiväni on huomenna, mutta tältä se näytti lauantaina:



Ei hullumpaa ensikertalaiselta, vaikka itse sanonkin! (En kommentoi miten monta kertaa kuvioraidat piti purkaa ja tehdä uusiksi.)

Briefly, I went to a weaving course and learned how to wind a warp, set up for weaving, and now I'm making my first rag rug ever, and am very happy about it - even if the first pattern stripe had to be re-woven about 10 times.

Old lace, new lace

I found an old bobbin lace pillow (probably homemade) on a flea market. It had a project pinned on, and an instruction book from the 1950s with it. The project was in a horrible tangle and one bobbin was broken. I untangled it, and glued the bobbin together:

Löysin nypläystyynyn kirpparilta halvalla! Siinä oli ohjekirja ja kesken jäänyt pitsiprojekti mukana. Nypylät olivat solmussa ja yksi oli poikki, mutta selvitin sotkun ja liimasin nypylän kokoon:



I noticed that there were some mistakes in the lace and unwove it a bit. There were still more mistakes left (a frustrated beginner maybe?), but I decided to leave them in to remember the last owner, as they weren't so bad:

Edellinen tekijä oli mennyt mallissa sotkuun, joten purin jonkun matkaa pois (ehkä työ oli jäänyt turhautumisesta kesken?). Jäljelle jääneessäkin pätkässä on virheitä muttei niin pahoja, joten päätin pitää ne muistona edellisestä omistajasta:



And this is how far I've come! I haven't taken a course, but bobbin lace was one of the things I played with as a kid/teenager, so I remembered the basic stitches with a little help from the instruction books (and a lot of weaving and unweaving). It's fun!

Näin pitkälle pääsin - en ole käynyt kurssilla, mutta opettelin pienenä itse kirjoista. Lunttasin vähän oppaista, ja kyllä se palasi mieleen kunhan tarpeeksi tekee ja purkaa. Kivaa!

Spinning fireweed fluff

Let's talk fluff.
Höttöistä asiaa...

Fireweed (Epilobium angustifolium, a.k.a. Great Willow-herb, or Rosebay Willowherb) is a pretty, red-blossomed weed:
Kaikki varmaan tietävät maitohorsman (Epilobium angustifolium)?



Every fall, the seed pods (those long, narrow things under the blossoms) break open and release a cloud of fluff. And every year, I wonder if you can spin it. This year, I grabbed a takhli and decided to find out:
Joka vuosi kun maitohorsman höytyviä lentelee ilmassa, mietin saisiko niistä lankaa. Tänä vuonna nappasin intialaisen tuetun takhli-värttinän, ja pitihän sitä yrittää:



Left: dry, open fireweed pods; middle top: discarded bits of broken singles; middle down: discarded pods; right: takhli with a cop of cotton, and spun fireweed singles wound at the top of the shaft.
Vasemmalla: maitohorsman siemenkotia, kesk. ylhäällä: katkenneita säikeitä, kesk. alhaalla: siemenkotien kuoria, oikealla: takhli, jossa puuvillalankaa ja varren ympärillä kierrettynä maitohorsmalankaa.

Fireweed fluff has a staple length of ca. 0,5-1 cm (+1/4 in), has no elasticity, will fly off at the slightest breath when dry and stick to anything damp (your hands, itself). You can't get the seeds out, but luckily they fill mostly fall off while spinning. In short, it's a pain to spin and will make a big mess. Nevertheless, after a while I started to get the hang of putting in just the right amount of twist to keep it structurally sound while not too much so that it snapped, and managed to make a bit of Z-spun singles. I then folded the singles in half and plied them S - twice, because the first go didn't give enough twist and the plied yarn drifted apart when tugging.

Maitohorsmakuidun pituus on 0,5-1 cm, eikä se jousta ollenkaan, lähtee kuivana lentoon pienimmästäkin henkäyksestä ja tarttuu kiinni kosteisiin käsiin tai myttäytyy yhteen. Siemeniä ei saa pois, mutta enimmät putoilevat irti kehrätesssä. Jos lankaan laittaa liian vähän kierrettä, se hajoaa ja jos liikaa, se katkeaa vetäessä. Onnistuin kuitenkin kehräämään vähän Z-kierteistä säiettä, jonka taitoin sitten kaksinkerroin ja kertasin tiukasti S-kierteiseksi (koska jos kertauskierrettä ei ole tarpeeksi, lanka voi hajota vetäessä).

And here it is:
Ja siinähän se:



There's a 5 euro-cent coin for scale. It's probably about 30 cm (1 ft) long bit of string altogether, fluffy and soft and a bit fragile.
Vertailun vuoksi 5 sentin kolikko. Lankaa on ehkä 30 cm, se on pehmyttä ja vähän haurasta.

An old Finnish source talks about the properties of fireweed:

Flora Fennica. 1866, written by Elias Lönnrot and Th. Saelan (via Henrietta's Herbal).

Folk usage: Fluff is good for stuffing pillows etc.; it may also be spun as yarn for candlewicks. The sprouts can be eaten in spring. Cows give plentiful milk when eating this plant. It would be good sown in stony dirt, where forest etc. is being allowed to grow. Roots spread over a wide area.


Löysin viimeinkin lähteen, missä kerrotaan maitohorsman haivenien kehruusta, eikä aivan vähäisen, (Henrietta's Herbal):

Flora Fennica. Suomen Kasvio, 1866, kirjoittaneet Elias Lönnrot ja Th. Saelan.

Epilobium angustifolium L. Maitohorsma. (R98: Epilobium angustifolium L. (Chamaenerion angustifolium (L.) Scop., Chamerion angustifolium (L.) Holub), maitohorma (rentun ruusu); duntrav, mjölkört.)
Muist. -- Haivenet sopivat täytteeksi tyynyihin j. n. e.; niistä taidetaan lankaaki kehrätä kynttilän sydämiksi. Juurivesat keväällä kelpaavat syödä parissina. Lehmät lypsävät hyvin tästä kasvista. Ansaitsisi viljeltää kivisessä ja multaisessa maanlaadussa, jossa metsää ynnä annetaan kasvaa. Juuret levenevät laajalta.

I have another fireweed (and nettle) project going, but more about that another time.
On minulla toinenkin maitohorsmaprojekti, mutta siitä lisää joskus toiste!

Summer stuff

Some thing done this summer... I got a drum carder:



And carded some batts:



And spun some yarn:



And did some demo in the kitchen:



And now I'm off to pick blueberries.

Tour de Fleece 2010

Reporting late, but I'm in the Tour de Fleece again this year. The goal?

1. Spin every day (One make counts.)
2. Try something new on the challenge day
3. For the Team Suck Less challenge of spinning a mile I’ll probably walk a mile while spindling, or something else since I am slow.

Today (day 10) is actually a rest day, but I've already done point 1. spinning today...

Stress test for handspun yarn

We were discussing relative strength of Navajo ply in Ravelry the other day. As I found myself bored and in need of entertainment this weekend, I did a little test, and here are the results.

The photos are clickable, and clicking will take you to Flickr if you want to see the details - but they are cell phone photos and I wasn't paying much attention on the settings, so apologies in advance for the horrid glare!

Test setup for measuring tensile strength

1 metre or 50 cm of yarn, each end tied to an S-hook with a square knot. One hook was hung from a laundry hanger thingie on the balcony, and a bag was attached to the other hook by its handles. Paperback books (and for more accurate measurements, bags of instant oatmeal and individually wrapped biscuits) were added into the bag until the yarn broke.

Notes on fibre, technique and the singles

Fibre: Ronaldsay pin-drafted roving from Scottish Fibres (medium wool with some kemp and VM that I didn’t bother to remove.)
Spindle: 11g "gingerbread" top whorl spindle from Rina's Spindles.
Drafting method: short draw with twist in the drafting zone
Twist direction: Z-spun singles, all yarns S-plied, all cables re-plied Z (including the double Navajo ply).
Type: semi-woolen
Length of material available: a rough couch-length of singles (ca. 1,8m) was measured for plying all different yarns
Twist setting method: yarn was dunked in hot water and left to dry hanging freely.

Here you can see all the yarns lined up:


Results

In the following there's first an image of the break, followed by the technical details of the yarn and the breaking point (all measurements are in the metric system):


Singles: ca. 38 wpi, twist angle 30-35° (1 metre sample)
Breaking point: 153g (+/-126g)



2-ply: ca. +24 wpi, plying twist angle (TA) 25° (1 metre sample)
Breaking point (BP): 556g (+/-196g)



3-ply: ca. 20 wpi, TA 20°
BP: 813g (+/-35g)
BP, second test: 838g (+/-35g)


Navajo ply: loop length: 20-30 cm, ca. 20 wpi, TA 20°
BP: 878g (+/-30g)
BP, second test: 767g (+/-35g)



4-ply: ca. 19 wpi, TA 20° (1 metre sample, stretched so much I had to move to using a shorter sample length)
BP: 1512g (+/-209g)



2x2 cable: ca. 18 wpi, TA 20°
BP: 1512g (+/-209g)



6-ply: ca. 14 wpi, TA 25°
BP: 2080g (+/-196g)



Navajo-ply, which was Navajo-plied with itself (comparable to a 9-ply): both initial and final loop length: 20-30 cm, ca. 12 wpi, TA 25°
BP: 2842g (+/- 180g)

Intermediary notes

Plying structure didn’t seem to matter very much: cabling didn’t give a dramatically greater increase in strength, and Navajo ply and traditional 3-ply were both roughly equally strong (In the first test Navajo ply survived 65g more than 3-ply and in the second, 3-ply survived 71g more, both with a tolerance of +/-35g, so the results were fairly close).

All Navajo plies showed the same distinctive pattern in breakage, as expected: in all weight tests, the break occurred at a “knot” point, usually leaving one loop in the chain intact and breaking the other one. The other structures show fraying and snapping, but it isn’t possible to predict in advance at which point of the yarn a break will occur, unlike in Navajo ply.

Stress testing continues

I still had lengths of yarn left, so I decided to perform another test - namely, how long would it take for the yarn to break, if I rubbed one point of a 30-cm long length of it against the metal radiator edge? Times varied, because I'm not a consistent machine and the yarns have weak spots, but if you are curious, here are the results of approximately how long it took to break the yarn:

Singles: 2 seconds
2-ply: 5 seconds
3-ply: 8 seconds, (second try: 23 seconds)
Navajo ply: 16 seconds, (second try: 23 seconds)
4-ply: 16 seconds
2x2 cable: 8 seconds
6-ply: 27 seconds
Double Navajo ply: 38 seconds

Still not content, I tried breaking one strand in the yarn and see how it held up to tugging (at this point, all pretense of scientific method had to be abandoned, as I don't have a device for measuring strength of pulling):

Singles: Broke easily.
2-ply: After one strand was broken, broke the same as singles yarn.
3-ply: Broke fairly easily.
Navajo ply: Broke fairly easily like the 3-ply, but if the break in the strand was close to the "knot" in the chain, the distinctive breaking pattern showed.
4-ply: Needed a little force to break.
2x2 cable: Same as 4-ply.
6-ply: Needed quite a bit of force to break.
Double Navajo ply: Needed a lot of force to break. Breaking pattern was similar to 6-ply, but if the break occurred close to a "knot" in the chain, the distinctive breaking pattern showed.

Conclusions

The single most important factor proved to be the number of plies. The strength of the yarn increased almost exponentially, when just one strand was added. The plying method was much less significant - cabled yarn and a 4-ply were roughly equal, as well as 3-ply and Navajo/chain ply, but either a 4-ply or cabled yarn was much stronger than a 3-ply or Navajo/chain ply.

The Ravelry discussion centered on the relative strength of Navajo ply. From this test I can say that at least for this fibre and these singles, 3-ply and Navajo ply were comparable. Because of the fuzziness of the fibre and the fineness of the singles, I had to check the yarn very, very closely to tell the two samples apart!

The main difference between the structures was that while the 3-ply would break at some unpredictable point wherever it was the weakest, Navajo ply would usually break at the "knot" or loop in the chain, showing the distinctive "strand and loop" pattern in one end. The exception to this was in the experiments with "sawing" the yarn through or breaking just one strand and tugging - if the break didn't occur near a knot, the yarn would behave in a similar manner to a 3-ply.

What can you conclude from all this? Surprisingly little, actually. The tests, as they stand, only comment on the suitability (or lack thereof) of using yarn for hanging things with and show that woolen spun yarn doesn't take abrasion kindly. If you change one factor (singles thickness, twist angle, drafting method, fiber preparation...) the yarn strength will change, sometimes more, sometimes less, so these results aren't the whole truth about yarn. Also, yarn in a knitted, woven or crocheted fabric will behave differently than yarn alone. Felting and level of wear and tear will also affect durability.

So don't take my word for this, but try it yourself and sample! Your yarn may yet surprise you.

(Use of these pictures (despite the less than stellar photography) and results is permitted if anyone so desires, I officially don't mind.)

Where the yarn ended up

So, the Ravelympics have been and gone. The yarn got finished in time, and almost immediately I cast on a pair of socks. Never mind that this was fairly high micron-count merino, and while it was a 3-ply with a fair amount of twist, it could've had more. I'm wearing the socks now, and although they are pilling and looking a bit bedraggled already, they are very, very comfortable.

On to the pictures:


3-ply Merino from Merinovilla, 217 m / 92 g, wpi: 14-18, spun with short draw across the top - on the wheel, natch.




Haruha socks, pattern by Kristel Nyberg.



What, another beauty shot?



And of course, the badge.


After that I have spun up some more stuff - but that's enough for one post, don't you think?